Tag: Rush Limbaugh

Rush: Obama Having a “Dictator’s Wet Dream!”

Rush Limbaugh Cartoon by Ian D. Marsden of mar...

We all now Rush Limbaugh is no stranger to controversy, but his statements on Monday statements have sent Media Matters readers into a crazed feeding frenzy and inspired all manner of truly enlightened commentary from the liberal media.

Rush commentated on Obama‘s bypassing Congress by “Imperial Fiat” to stop young illegal immigrants from being deported by saying, “So once again we see which side Obama comes down on, in the question of whether [we are] a country with the rule of law, or the rule of man.  With Obama, it’s not the rule of law.  He is implementing law that the Congress defeated, as in the legalization of the amnesty for 800,000 young illegals– Congress defeated that, the Dream Act.”

And, truthfully, that is exactly what Obama did.  Do you remember American Government or Social Studies in elementary school?  The Legislature (Congress) passes the laws and the Executive (the President) enforces the laws.  I guess they do not teach that anymore!  Well … at least not in Obama’s world; nor does his government follow that Constitutional principle.  Now … if the Legislature doesn’t pass a law Obama like … he creates it by “Imperial Fiat;” and if the Legislature passes a law he doesn’t like …. he simply decrees it will not be enforced!  So much for co-equal branches of government, checks and balances, and democracy!  Say hello to dictatorship! Until this point, Rush was simply stating facts ….

But … then Rush uttered the phrase that really drove the Obama lap-dog media into a lather!  Rush said, “It‘s a dictator’s wet dream to do what Obama is doing.  If he doesn’t agree with the law, voila, it’s no longer enforced.  It may as well not even exist.  That’s who he is, folks!”

Now, when you compare this phrase to some of Bill Maher’s liberal hate speech utterances about Sarah Palin and her family,

Or those of MSNBC‘s Lawrence O’Donnell (Did anyone tell O’Donnell that his buddy, Harry Reid, is a Mormon):

“Mormonism was created by a guy in upstate New York in 1830 when he got caught having sex with the maid and explained to his wife that God told him to do it. Forty-eight wives later, Joseph Smith’s lifestyle was completely sanctified in the religion he invented to go with it. Which Mitt Romney says he believes.”

Or Al Sharpton’s comments:

“White folks was [sic] in caves while we was building empires…. We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it,”

Jesse Jackson’s comments on “Hymie Town” or that “conservatives are apartheid nazis,”

Keith Oberman vicious comments about Crystal Palin, Britt Hume, Michelle Malkin,

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews fantasizing about killing Rush Limbaugh (while Obama sends a chill up his leg),

Sandra Bernhard imagining her friends gang raping Sarah Palin and calling Crystal Palin a hooker on the Joy Behar Show,

Joy Behar saying “This B*tch, Sharron Angle, Is Going to Hell,”

and MSNBC’s Ed Shultz wanting to “rip out Cheney’s heart and lick it around;”

Rush’s comment seems to be pretty mild …. in comparison!  But, hey, liberals never let the facts interfere with a good story!

And, of course, the immediate response from the liberal left was perfect … and so very typical.  No facts, counter-points,  or legitimate argument contrary to the point Rush was making (because there really aren’t any … Rush is Right); just typical liberal personal attacks and name calling.  It is sad to think the future of America is in the hands of people who thing these are opposing points in an argument:

  • One Media Matters commentator asked, “If he’s such a dictator, why is he letting a d*ck like you stay on the radio, Rush?”
  • Another wrote: “See, here’s a subject Fats is an expert on. He often has wet dreams about being a dictator. A dictator on an island filled with nothing but teenaged Dominican boys…”
  • And, yet another, who likely did not listen to Limbaugh’s explanation commented, nor has ever read the Constitution of the United States quipped, “So, the Constitution of the United States is a ‘dictator’s wet dream’?”

Limbaugh clarified that he didn’t say this in a jocular manner.  That fact is that, if Obama can simply decide which laws he will enforce or obey and which he won’t;  what does prevent Obama from deciding, for example, that he doesn’t like the 22nd amendment (which limits presidents to only two terms) and simply decides it will no longer be enforced?

Liberals will snort and and gaze down at you over their up-turned noses and say:

Come on Rush, there’s no way Obama would ever dispense with elections…

There’s no way Obama would ever not enforce immigration law…

No way Obama would ignore the Constitution and just write a health care law that basically pees all over it

Of course He wouldn’t!

Rush then asked,  “What if we started obeying laws on that [basis]?  If the president of the United States can choose to enforce or not enforce law because he likes them or doesn’t like them, what about us?  What if we disagree with the speeding law?…What if we don’t like paying income tax, because frankly, I hate it.  What if I just decide, screw it!”

“But of course, we don’t have that ability,” Limbaugh concluded.

I would say we do!  That was the whole idea behind the American Revolution!!

How’s HOPE and CHANGE working out for you?

Part 1, The Truth About Cap and Tax (Oops … my bad!  I mean trade)! 

Why would Obama and his liberal dream team work so hard to rush through such a horrible, economically disasterous, travesty of a bill.  It makes absolutely no sense at all … unless … just maybe … Rush Limbaugh is correct; and Obama simply hates America and simply wants to drive this country into bankruptcy to destroy it.  

In my opinion, any Representative or Senator who votes for this bill is not a true American and does not have this country’s best interests at heart.  In fact, in my opinion, they are actually “domestic enemies” of this country and should be treated as such!

It is time for conservative Americans step up and be heard.  We need to stop this legislative catastophe called the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill before the Senate can foolishly approve it.   Too many Americans sat, stupified, watching the mind-numbing mass media coverage of the deification of Michael Jackson … while the House of Representatives used this Hollywood lovefest as cover to pass this bill while nobody was looking.  Americans should have taken that time to understand how bad this bill really is … and not to worship a troubled, drug addicted man with a serious identity crisis who slept with young boys … but was not a pediphile.

By the way, what happened to Obama’s campaign pledge of open and transparent government process …. Oh well!

This bill is being sold to us  as a means to slow man-caused carbon emissions  … and thus help prevent global warming.  However, even if we were to accept  as fact the absurd assertions of  hysterical, tree-hugging, leftists  that man is causing the global warming that will destroy the planet … Cap & Trade could (and would) not prevent this disaster.

According to reknowned climate scientist Chip Knappenberger, this bill would only reduce Earth’s temperature by 0.1 to 0.2 degree Celsius by 2100.   This calculation is backed up by  Heritage Foundation’s Ben Lieberman, who states that he can find no legimate counter to the assertion that the impact of this bill on the global temperature  would be inconsequential.

On the other hand, it is pretty clear that this Cap & Tax bill will have a major negative impact on the economy … one that which would not be inconsequential. 

Some experts estimate that  this bill will cause  job losses averaging about 1.15 million between 2012 and 2030, and the cumulative projected loss in gross domestic product would be almost $10 trillion by 2035.  This means that the national debt burden would increase by 26 percent, or $115,000,  by 2035 for a typical American family of four. 

Even liberal economists (at least those who have some personal integrity) such as with the  Brookings Institution, estimate that this farce  known as Cap & Tax would cost as much as 1.8 percent of the GDP in 2035 and 2.5 percent by 2050.

The fact is that economists from liberal think tanks, conservative think tanks, and industry associations all agree that Waxman-Markey cap & trade bill will reduce income by hundreds of billions of dollars per year.

So, I ask again … why the big rush to pass it?  Why is Obama and his henchmen (and henchwomen) pressing so hard to get it passed so quickly?  What does Obama gain?

If these facts are not enough to make you question why the American people aren’t screaming …. and threatening to un-elect,  impeach, or lynch anyone involved with passing this travesty of a bill,  here are a few other little tidbits about this Cap & Tax fiasco you should understand:

  1. This bill contains a hidden provision establishing unemployment benefits for up to three full years for workers displaced as a result of Cap & Tax, as well as health insurance premium subsidies and $1,500 each for job search and relocation expenses …  all at taxpayers’ expense.
  2. The American Issues Project has uncovered a section (Section 204) of this bill that gives the federal government unprecedented authority over your home.  This section mandates that new homes be 30 percent more energy-efficient than the current building code on the very day the law is signed and  this requirement will increase to 50 percent by 2014 … and continues to increase until 2030.
  3. The bill would also affect existing properties you currently own. It requires states to label residential and nonresidential buildings based on their efficiency ratings and to publicize this information. This will allow states to inspect a building for a myriad of reasons including: you want to renovate your house in a way that requires a building permit, you want to sell your house, or you even want to just change the name of the person responsible for paying its utilities.
  4. Our liberal government officials, with their boundless generosity with other people’s money, have also set aside a fund to help homeowners retrofit their properties. 
  5. This bill is so obscene that even with the strong Democratic majority in the House, it couldn’t have passed it without bribing some reluctant representatives.  In fact, to buy Ohio Rep. Marcy Kaptur’s vote, Obama and hs dream team offered her a new federal power authority, which, according to The Washington Times, is loaded with up to $3.5 billion in taxpayer’s money available for lending to renewable energy and economic development projects in Ohio and other Midwestern states.    Hmmmmm!  Imagine that ……
  6. The truth is that, in addition to all the economic destruction the bill would wreak, this bill is not about global warming at all. It simply creates a new revenue stream for Obama’s shadow government.  It is really about the Obamian wealth redistribution plan.  Obama’s own budget promises to raise $650 billion in revenues by selling carbon permits (simply a form of indirect taxation).  However, only $150 billion of this $650 billion will go to alternative energy production. The rest will be redistributed to people who “don’t pay income taxes.”

Enough is enough!  Are we, as Americans, going to sit by and let this great country abandon its principles of personal freedom, equal opportunity, individual achievement, and real economic prosperity … and go quietly into the dark … sowing the seeds of our own destruction.

It is time for true Patriotic Americans to make a stand!